District’s Safety Concerns Do Not Justify Shortened School Day

In Castaic (Ca) Union Elementary Sch. Dist., 58 IDELR 234 (OCR IX, San Francisco (Ca) 2011), the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) determined that the school district denied students with mobility impairments a free appropriate public education when it shortened their school days and reduced their instructional time to ensure student safety. A group of elementary school students with mobility impairments and who used buses with wheelchair lifts filed a complaint with OCR because their school day was shortened. For most elementary school students in the district the school day lasted six hours and 31 minutes. But students who used buses with wheelchair lifts were required to leave their last class of the day 36 minutes earlier. After its investigation, OCR noted that this resulted in these students receiving 180 less instructional minutes per week than students who did not use buses with wheel chair lifts. The school district argued that having the accessible and regular buses run on the same schedule was too chaotic and potentially dangerous.

OCR agreed that safety may have been a relevant consideration, but it was not a valid reason for denying students with mobility impairments an equal educational opportunity. To be sure, if a shortened day is medically and educationally necessary, it may be appropriate for an individual student. But a shortened day for an entire category of students (such as these students who used accessible buses), is not an individualized decision. The school district agreed to develop a procedure to ensure that students with mobility impairments who received transportation services would receive equal instruction time.

About these ads

6 Responses

  1. This is a great decision! And if you’re a parent, advocate or student out there the length of the bus ride can also be subject to investigation by OCR if it exceeds the time nondisabled students in the neighborhood are on a bus.

  2. MR. Chapman how can i find this on the ocr website. I sent your blog to my school district here in norfolk,va. I would like find the ruling and send it in from the site. I couldnt find it. any suggestions?

    • The case can be found in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Law Reporter (IDELR) at 58 IDELR 234. You may be able to access that through a law school or court law library or you might contact your state Protection & Advocacy agency, see their contact info below. Thank you for reading my blog and for contacting me.
      Virginia Office for Protection & Advocacy
      1910 Byrd Avenue, Suite 5
      Richmond, VA 23230
      Phone: 804-225-2042 Voice/TTY \ 800-552-3962 (in VA only)
      Fax: 804-662-7057
      E-Mail: general.vopa@vopa.virginia.gov
      Website: http://www.vopa.state.va.us

  3. Thanks for sharing this story. We need to use the prohibition against discrimination in Section 504 and the ADA more frequently.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 661 other followers

%d bloggers like this: